Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) is a Ca2+-mobilizing second messenger synthesised in response to extracellular stimuli. Like its mechanistic cousins, IP3 and cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (Cyclic ADP-ribose), NAADP binds to and opens Ca2+ channels on intracellular organelles, thereby increasing the intracellular Ca2+ concentration which, in turn, modulates sundry cellular processes (see Calcium signalling). Structurally, it is a dinucleotide that only differs from the house-keeping enzyme cofactor, NADP by a hydroxyl group (replacing the nicotinamide amino group) and yet this minor modification converts it into the most potent Ca2+-mobilizing second messenger yet described. NAADP acts across phyla from plants to humans.
Discovery
In their landmark 1987 paper, Hon Cheung Lee and colleagues discovered not one but two Ca2+-mobilizing second messengers, cADPR and NAADP from the effects of nucleotides on Ca2+ release in sea urchin egg homogenates. It turns out that NAADP was a contaminant in commercial sources of NADP, but it was not until 1995 that its structure was solved. The first demonstration that NAADP could act in mammalian cells (pancreas) came four years later. Subsequently, NAADP has been detected in sources as diverse as human sperm, red and white blood cells, liver, and pancreas, to name but a few.
Synthesis and degradation
Kinetics and transduction The first demonstration that NAADP levels increase in response to an extracellular stimulus arose from studying sea urchin fertilization (NAADP changed in both the eggs and sperm upon contact). Subsequently, other cell types have followed suit, as exemplified by the pancreas (acinar and beta cells), T-cells, and smooth muscle. Levels increase very rapidly — and possibly precede the increase in the other messengers IP3 and cADPR— but can be very transient (spiking and returning to basal levels within seconds). The transduction mechanisms that couple cell stimuli to such NAADP increases are ill-defined, with some suggestions of cyclic AMP or cytosolic Ca2+ itself stimulating synthesis.
Synthetic enzymes Regardless of the details, an outstanding issue is that the physiological route of NAADP synthesis has still not been unequivocally identified — neither the reaction(s) nor the enzyme(s). Clearly, it is theoretically possible there may be multiple routes of synthesis, but this would be unprecedented in the second messenger world. To date, the most favoured hypothesis is the so-called base-exchange reaction (nicotinic acid + NADP → NAADP + nicotinamide; catalyzed by ADP-ribosyl cyclases) which are a family of enzymes that include CD38 and CD157 in mammals (and orthologs in sea urchin and Aplysia ovotestis). These were first discovered as the synthetic enzymes for cADPR but later revealed to be multifunctional, promiscuous enzymes that can also produce NAADP. Certainly NAADP production can occur in vitro but whether it occurs in vivo is another question (because genetic knockout or knock-down of ADP-ribosyl cyclases has no effect on NAADP production in some cell types), and there may be other routes which require different substrates and enzymes.
The SARM1 enzyme also catalyzes the formation of NAADP from NAD+.
The first chemical synthesis of NAADP was achieved in 2004 using a chemoenzymatic approach: a total chemical synthesis of NADP and then conversion of this to NAADP enzymatically.
Degradative enzymes Like any second messenger system, the signal must be terminated and there must be routes for NAADP removal but again, little is known with any degree of certainty. A 2'-3'-phosphatase stimulated by Ca2+ has been proposed in brain and, possibly in pancreatic acinar cells, that catabolises NAADP to inactive NAAD. CD38 has also been found to breakdown NAADP (to ADPRP — see inset). NAADP may also be reduced to NAADPH.
NAADP-selective physiology Hardly surprisingly, the three major second messengers do not do the same thing and cannot always substitute for each other. The physiological consequences of Ca2+ release by each messenger may be different i.e. NAADP couples to downstream responses that cannot be mimicked by IP3 and cADPR. For example, NAADP selectively stimulates neuronal differentiation, or exocytosis in cytotoxic T-cells.
Target organelle In contrast to IP3 and cyclic ADP-ribose which predominantly mobilize Ca2+ from the neutral and abundant endoplasmic reticulum (ER) store, NAADP selectively targets acidic Ca2+ stores — usually less abundant than the ER but with a pivotal role that belies their size. This paradigm shift away from the ER derives from seminal studies, again in sea urchin egg, that showed NAADP-mediated Ca2+ release was sensitive to agents that target acidic organelles (e.g. bafilomycin A1) but was less sensitive to ones that interfere with ER Ca2+ storage (e.g. thapsigargin).
Acidic Ca2+ store This is a blanket term that encompasses a spectrum of acidic vesicles that include endosomes, lysosomes, and lysosome-related organelles and secretory vesicles and acidocalcisomes. They are a highly dynamic continuum of vesicles with a rich variety of established biochemical roles in cells, to which Ca2+ storage can now be added. Their luminal pH is one characteristic that distinguishes a given vesicle class from another: where endosomes are weakly acidic (pH 6-6.5), lysosomes are typically the most acidic (pH 4.5-5.0) and secretory vesicles are typically pH 5.5. Ca2+ is seen to be increasingly important for endo-lysosomal function, e.g. trafficking and autophagy. Aberrations in Ca2+ signals can have pathophysiological consequences, including lysosomal storage diseases such as Niemann–Pick disease, type C and Mucolipidosis IV.
When NAADP mobilizes Ca2+ from these stores, the pH of the stores concomitantly increases (becomes more alkaline), as testified by studies in sea urchin egg, mammalian heart and pancreas. Whether this has consequences for vesicle (or NAADP) function remains to be seen, but luminal pH is usually crucial for resident protein activity.
Ca2+ uptake
In other Ca2+-storing organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi, stores are filled by calcium ATPase pumps, typified by the ubiquitous members of the SERCA or the SPCA (secretory pathway Ca2+-ATPase) families respectively. Ca2+ uptake by acidic stores occurs via other proteins: in yeast and plants (the best understood systems) the acidic vacuoles host two uptake pathways: a high affinity Ca2+-ATPase and a low affinity Ca2+/H+ antiporter (or exchanger, generically denoted as CHX). The pumps are different from the SERCA family (and, importantly, are insensitive to their inhibitor, thapsigargin) whereas the exchanger exploit the H+ gradient to drive Ca2+ uptake against its concentration gradient. The genes encoding these proteins are well-defined.
In higher organisms, the situation is less clear. Ca2+ uptake usually occurs via a thapsigargin-insensitive pathway (therefore precluding SERCA involvement) and appears to be dependent upon the H+ gradient; whether this occurs via a single (unknown) CHX or via exchangers in series (e.g. Na+/H+ exchanger coupled to a Na+/Ca2+ exchanger) is unproven. Acidic vesicles in some cell types may well take a leaf out of the yeasts'/plants' book and host two uptake pathways, but whether this is a widespread template is unclear.
In the absence of selective Ca2+ uptake inhibitors (often because we do not even know the protein/route), it is common to indirectly inhibit Ca2+ uptake by collapsing the thermodynamic drive (the H+ gradient). The H+ gradient can be eliminated either with H+ ionophores (protonophores) such as nigericin or monensin or by inhibiting the V-ATPase that generates the H+ gradient with compounds such as bafilomycin A1 or concanamycin.
Target channel (two pore channels or TPCs)
Even from the early pioneering work in sea urchin egg, it was clear from the pharmacological profile that NAADP acted upon a different channel from the IP3 receptor and ryanodine receptor and this has recently been borne out by the molecular identification of the NAADP receptor as members of the TPC (two-pore channel) family. As structural intermediates between single domain TRP and four-domain voltage-dependent calcium channel, the TPCs form oligomers (possibly dimers) to form the functional Ca2+ channel. Appropriately, these channels reside on acidic organelles (including different classes of endosomes and lysosomes) likely due to the presence of endolysomal targeting sequences.
The effect of genetic manipulation of TPC levels (i.e. over-expression, knock-down or knock-out) is consistent with TPCs being the NAADP-gated channel. Moreover, TPCs recapitulate many of the characteristics of NAADP-induced Ca2+ release i.e. they promote Ca2+ release from acidic stores, correlate with NAADP-binding sites, exhibit a bell-shaped NAADP concentration-response curve, sensitivity to the NAADP antagonist, Ned-19, and provide trigger Ca2+ that is subsequently amplified by ER Ca2+ channels.
Isoforms There are 3 genes that encode three isoforms of TPC1-3 that differ substantially from each other in their primary sequence (but these differences are preserved across species, such that human and sea urchin TPC1 are more closely related than are human TPC1 and human TPC2). Moreover, the TPC isoforms exhibit different organellar distributions, with TPC1 being found throughout the endo-lysosomal system (although predominantly in recycling and early endosomes) whereas TPC2 shows a more restricted late-endosomal/lysosomal localization.
Controversy and plasticity In spite of a burgeoning literature supporting TPCs as the NAADP-regulated channel, this was challenged in 2012/13 by reports that TPCs are, instead, Na+ channels regulated by the endo-lysosomal lipid, Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate, PI(3,5)P2 and also by metabolic state (via ATP and mTOR). This controversy ultimately evolved into a new model of how TPCs work.
The challenge raised two different, but interrelated issues: (a) TPCs are insensitive to NAADP; (b) TPCs are Na+- (and not Ca2+-) permeable.
NAADP does activate TPCs The surprising conclusion in 2012 that TPCs are not involved in NAADP signalling was due to two technical difficulties that have since been overcome or explained.
(i) The transgenic mice (designed to knockout both TPC1 and TPC2; double-knockout, DKO) retained sensitivity to NAADP. However, others have questioned whether these mice are true DKO when they are predicted to retain >90% of the TPC protein sequences (i.e. they express only mildly truncated TPCs which are still functional and NAADP-sensitive ). In a different DKO mouse that is demonstrably TPC-null, NAADP responses are completely abolished, confirming TPCs are an NAADP target.
(ii) The authors could not observe NAADP-stimulated currents in patched lysosomes. These technically challenging protocols were overcome by others who have successfully observed NAADP-dependent lysosomal currents that are dependent on TPCs.
Ionic selectivity and plasticity Several groups reinvestigated the permeability properties of TPCs and their role in NAADP-induced Ca2+ release, and they agreed that TPCs are indeed permeable to Na+ but they could not necessarily recapitulate the Na+ selectivity shown in the 2012/13 studies. It was therefore initially proposed that TPCs may conduct both Ca2+ and Na+ (analogous to the NMDA receptor of the plasma membrane).